attacks CHRISTIANITY in a lawsuit against JESUS CHRIST
and the Catholic Church.
Luigi Cascioli, by bringing a lawsuit with a formal
denunciation-action filed at a civil court so that the
non-existence of one of the three people of the Trinity,
i.e., Jesus Christ is acknowledged, carries out the
first lawsuit against God. He does not resort to purely
theoretical reasoning as was done in the past, but shows
evidence, which taken from history, is evident and therefore
The book, THE FABLE OF CHRIST, after having carefully
demonstrated the NON-existence of Jesus Christ, ends
with a denunciation against the ministers of the Church
so that, following a court sentence, the great fraud
of Christianity will be banned from society.
The absurdity of the Trinity, which theology had managed
up until now to support by evading reason and good sense
with that subterfuge called mystery, is confirmed in
all its utopia and eccentricity by the book, THE FABLE
OF CHRIST, through incontrovertible historical documentation
showing the non-existence of its second person: Jesus.
having read THE FABLE OF CHRIST, many people have affirmed
that this book, by destroying the figure of Christ,
besides determining the end of Christianity, will also
cause the other two monotheist religions (Judaism and
Islam) and all the other religions, based on similar
irrational fairy-tales, to totter.
Only by nullifying reason can one impose a morality
(false morality) based on truths that are not demonstrable
(dogmas) which are to be considered purely abstract
and utopian. One example out of many is the one regarding
the existence of a life after death which as a result
of God's judgement can mean an eternity of happiness
or suffering for every man.
Who is God?
"God is the most perfect creator and lord of the
heavens and the earth," believers reply, "He
is the one who made everything from nothing and from
which all things proceed. He is eternal, infinitely
good, omniscient and omnipotent."
are all incoherent and contradictory affirmations,"
reply the atheists, who are only just confirming that
a similar being can only be a construction supported
by superstition and ignorance.
Evil exists, therefore either God knows it exists or
he doesn't know it exists.
God knows that evil exists, he can destroy it but he
doesn't want to... such a God would be cruel and perverse,
2) God knows that evil exists, he wants to destroy it
but he can't...such a God would be impotent, therefore
3) God does not know that evil exists...such a God would
be blind and ignorant, therefore inadmissible.
who continued Epicurus' work, in his "De Rerum
Natura" destroys every concept of divinity by writing:
"The principle that we can place over all others
is that nothing is born from nothing for a divine power
(ex nihilo nihil). The fear that currently dominates
all mortals and makes them slaves to the religions depends
on the fact that they see things occur on earth that
they do not understand and so they attribute them to
divine power. It is only following the conviction that
brings us to affirm that nothing can be created from
nothing that we can discover the object of our research
whose result will demonstrate how everything occurs
without the intervention of God".
is the name which from the beginning of time man has
given to his ignorance." (Max Nordeau)
"It is absurd to admit the existence of a creator
since it is impossible not only to demonstrate but also
to imagine that nothing transforms itself into something
and that something transforms itself into nothing."
"Nothing is created and nothing is destroyed but
everything is transformed." affirmed Lavoisier
demonstrating it scientifically.
number of religions that each support their own God
whom they declare to be the only true one compared to
all others whom they consider to be false, led Dr. Carret
to this conclusion: "The matter can be put like
this: either God wanted to let himself be known by man
or he didn't want to be. If he wanted man to know him
and he didn't succeed this can only demonstrate that
he is impotent; an impotent God is inadmissible. If
God didn't want to be known then all religions are false.
If God didn't want either one, then we have to conclude
that God does not exist".
To demonstrate that Christianity is a false religion
it is enough just to report what St. Augustine wrote
in 350 when it was considered heresy to affirm that
the earth was round: "If it could be shown that
the earth is round, then Catholicism would be shown
to be a mistake".
The concept of a perfect God is already in itself the
demonstration of the non-existence of a God creator.
The word perfect, in its meaning of absolute completeness,
excludes a God who had the desire and the need to give
himself, through creation, something that he lacked.
For however much one tries to make God metaphysical
by placing him in a transcendental world outside of
matter, God, being a product of man, of his ignorance,
his superstition, his interests and egoism, cannot help
being, as he really is, a being composed of the worst
human defects. Just read the Bible to realize how much
God is an anthropomorphic being.
The God of the Bible is irascible, envious, proud, vain,
authoritarian... a true criminal who encompasses the
worst side of man.
(Read THE FABLE OF CHRIST).
order to construct a perfect, omnipotent, and omniscient
God, man has transferred onto God everything that really
belongs to mankind. The result of this is that Heaven
has become rich with the goods of an earth so sacked
and impoverished that man is forced to resort to the
supernatural (God). This God will give man what he needs
through revelations that he grants only, by sheer coincidence,
to his ministers such as priests, witch doctors, fortune
tellers, etc. who by declaring themselves intermediaries,
subjugate mankind which has been rendered foolish by
All men, intellectually alienated by these self-proclaimed
mediators who put themselves between matter and transcendence
under the threat of divine punishment, owe everything
to God and the occult forces in absolute obedience.
The coercion to blindly obey laws that come from a metaphysical
world, an abstract and utopian world, by requiring the
abdication of reason and human justice, the denial of
liberty, evolution, and social emancipation, can have
no other purpose but that of reducing man to a theoretical
and practical slavery. This leads us to conclude without
fear of being proven wrong, that where God exists, man
is a slave and where man is free God cannot exist.
American bishop Brown (condemned by the Church twice
for heresy), by denying any creationist concept and
therefore a transcendental God, wrote: "My God
is a trinity where matter is the Father, the force that
moves it the Son and the law which regulates it the
Holy Spirit. God is the union of Nature with mankind
which works to build the happiest possible society".
Prosper Alfaric, former professor of theology in great
French seminaries, converting to atheism, concluded
at the Sorbonne in a conference intended to demonstrate
the absurdity of a creator and legislator God: "If
atheists repudiate traditional faith it is not only
because this faith is in contrast with the affirmations
of believers themselves, with reason that denies the
idea of God, but because they have understood that false
dogmas go against true morality, against the social
demands of the world we live in. The belief in God is
not only a simple illusion, a purely theoretical error.
It misrepresents the practical direction of life by
orienting it in a chimerical direction. It goes against
the social realty, against the essential needs of mankind
which are the primary motor and the ultimate goal of