ILL.MO SIG. JUDGE FOR THE INDANIS PRELIMINARI
Preoperating away fax to the telephone n.ro of the
Penal chancellery. GIP AND GUP.
By garbini 136
Fax GIP and GUP: 0761. 352827
undersigned lawyer, in virtue of the special proxy in
mortar, defender, in the actual procedure, of the denunciante
the reception of the notice of fixation of the date
of the hearing in Chamber of suggestion for the next
21.11.2003 door to the attention of the ill.mo Judge
the following considerations.
investigations have taken the movements from the accusation
that the denunciante Luigi Calcioli you/he/she has moved
against Mr. Henry Righi - that it is currently the priest
of Bagnoregio-pointing out as the same Mr. Henry Righi,
voluntarily induces in error some of the people through
the imposture of the incontestability of Jesus of Nazaret.
Contrarily and according to a lot of authoritative historical
and scientific sources, the human stories attributed
to Christ are - as he/she reports the same Luigi Cascioli-you
remodel on the history of a real character: a certain
Giovanni of Gamala; other and different from the Jesus
of the Gospel; what, accordingly it is the literary
elaboration risen by the reconstruction of the commemorative
figurative portrait of he, that is recomposed doing
it sets her/it of the original his/her semblances of
native guerrillero antiromano. To it retries that Mr.
Henry rules is usual to persuade the people which turn
his/her own writings giving for real the man Jesus,
the sheet of the Bulletin of the Parish of S. Bonaventura
you/he/she has been attached in Gagnoregio n.245 of
March - April 2002 in the report.
defense allows that to the appearance the facts seem
to consist in a dispute telogica, but the things are
not in these terms.
the Luigi's Calcioli confutations on the derivation
of the figure of Jesus of the Gospel from the history
of such Giovanni I give birth of Giuda of said Gamala
the Galileo - a revolutionary been born to Gamala in
Golanite that, to be descending of a dynasty, that of
the Asmoneis, which it declared him of stock davidica
and therefore it inhaled to the throne, it was pretender
to the kingdom of Giuda and in consequence of this it
organized, but without success, a historian revolt in
weapons against the garrison in Rome that was the occupying
power in Jerusalem. -Mr. Henry rules, that knows also
the book of Calcioli, you/he/she has answered, challenging
him/it, with in to affirm in the quoted bulletin and
turning to whoever reads as is to intend, as from him
you/he/she is narrated you, a real being certainly the
man Jesus '.
the lesion to the protected juridical good from the
penal norms that are assumed you are been violated by
Mr. Henry Righi in report is actual. Still. Certainly
actual the unlawfulness of the voluntary attribution
of forgery name or of forgery state of a false quality
(which achieves an any juridical effect) also where,
as in the case in examination, publicly the diffused
imposture concerns to the name, the state and the quality
of a person, Giovanni I give birth of Giuda (been born
to Gamala in Golanite) that lives in a remote past.
it is recognizable and recognized the scientific incontestability
of the real affiliation to the history of the man Jesus
and best man, to signature of Mr. Henry Righi, in the
quoted bulletin the human story of a man described and
defended as if it absolutely were historical and this
is absolutely done through the mere sources reference
not coeve and notoriously formed him away from the places
in which I/you/they am ambientati the events and the
characters of the story (as it is the Council of Calcedonia),
it appears not groundless the debit moved to Mr. Henry
Righi to want that he continues in to induce (despite
the numerous ones and you acquire to the knowledge contrary
and concordant tests) in error the more-covertly attaching
positions of the Cascioli - thanks to the imposture
of the historical incontestability of Jesus of Nazaret.
the light of such reasonings he/she wonders, therefore,
that this ill.mo Judge, kept account of the imprescindibilità
of the indication of Mr. Henry Righi what presumed author
of the violations, wants to point out him/it, to make
to recognize and if you/he/she allows you to make to
feel what blamed to the goals of the demonstration of
his/her involvement for the facts reported by to appraise
to the goals of the prosecution of the actual procedure.
Avvocato Mauro Fonzo .
undersigned born Luigi Calcioli 16.02.34 to Bagnoregio
(VT) and resident ivi in Roccalvecce-Viterbo, street
of the Provinces 45/B nomination to really defender
the lawyer Mauro Fonzo of the hole of Perugina, October
17 th 1952 and resident been born in Rome to Foligno
(PG), Cavour avenue 84, telephone 0742.340038, conferring
to the aforementioned defender every faculty to name
his/her substitutes to the senses of the art 102 of
the C.P.P. as well as to the senses and for the effects
of the art. 122 C.P.Ps. the undersigned constitutes
and it names the aforesaid defender really special attorney
for the conclusion of every type of defensive activity
recognized by the direct law to get that the criminal
liability is affirmed with consequent sentence of the
blamed one, attributing him every necessary faculty
to the accomplishment of the order inclusive ivi that
to introduce the action ready to the competent authority,
to compile and to introduce all the appeals of any type
understood the application of probative accident, to
formalize applications of reimbursement of the damage
and to propose every type of impugnazione faculty hips
of the defender.
expresses his/her own consent to the treatment of the
personal data to the senses of the Law n. 675/1996 that
it declares to know in his/her exact terms.
does besides present that Luigi Cascioli is available
to present himself/herself/themselves in front of the
S.V. to furnish every profit explanation and, therefore,
the same denunciante asks to be felt.
– Viterbo, 15 novembre 2003.
Avvocato Mauro Fonzo